Feedback

PsyTheater welcomes clear, specific and source-supported feedback that helps improve accuracy, context, fairness and reader value.

Feedback is most useful when it identifies a specific article, claim, missing source or point of confusion. General disagreement may be valid, but factual review requires details.

What kind of feedback helps

• Possible factual errors or outdated information.
• Missing context about psychology, psychiatry, therapy or mental health systems.
• Broken or misleading source links.
• Unclear wording, potentially stigmatizing language or confusing framing.
• Expert corrections from qualified clinicians, researchers or subject-matter professionals.
• Story ideas, source suggestions or overlooked topic areas.
• Concerns about sponsored content, advertising claims or conflicts of interest.

Reporting a possible error

Email [email protected] with the article URL, the exact sentence or claim at issue, what seems wrong, and any reliable source or explanation that can help us review it.

Suggesting a story or source

Story tips should include the topic, why it matters to PsyTheater’s audience, relevant documents or links, and any available expert or institutional context. Sending a tip does not guarantee publication.

Expert feedback

Clinicians, researchers, educators and other specialists may send comments, corrections or context. Please identify relevant credentials or professional experience so the editorial team can evaluate the submission appropriately.

What we may not be able to do

• Respond to every message individually.
• Remove factually supported material only because a party dislikes it.
• Change editorial conclusions without factual basis.
• Publish every submitted article, comment or source suggestion.

Where to send feedback